🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, Trump gave the impression to embrace a firm approach concerning the Ukrainian conflict. After making warnings of "severe consequences" in August if Vladimir Putin continued blocking peace negotiations, the former president ultimately introduced considerable sanctions on Russia's biggest petroleum corporations, Lukoil and Rosneft. This action significantly hindered the Russian leader's capacity to finance his military invasion in the region.

Yet, with his newly presented detailed peace plan for Ukraine, reportedly developed by US and Russian representatives excluding Ukraine's or EU involvement, Trump has clearly returned to his Russia-friendly position.

Rewarding Invasion

This initiative would in practice favor the Russian leader for occupying a sovereign nation while leaving Ukraine's democracy in danger. Although strong declarations that "Ukraine's autonomy will be upheld", large portions of the plan effectively compromise that same independence. This constitutes a Moscow's wish would probably be a catastrophe for the nation.

Demonstrating his real-estate experience, the former president persists to consider the war as a basic territorial dispute, implying giving Putin a portion of Ukrainian land will appease the leader. However, Russia's war is not merely about controlling a damaged swath of deindustrialized land in eastern Ukraine. It is about Ukraine's democracy – and the Russian leader's apparent intention to destroy it so it stops functions as an appealing model for the Russian people of the accountable government that Putin's deepening authoritarian rule denies them.

Land Concessions

While keeping in place the currently divided regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, the initiative would force Ukraine to give up the whole Donetsk region. In addition to rewarding the Russian Federation with land that its forces have been unsuccessful to occupy in exceeding a lengthy period of conflict, this concession would make Ukrainian defenses critically compromised.

Donetsk is the location of Ukraine's highly-touted "stronghold system", the fortified protective structures that are a key impediment to Russian advances. The proposal would have Ukraine abandon these positions, providing Russian forces a unobstructed path to the capital should he eventually choose to resume the war.

Military Limitations

Furthermore, in a move that would facilitate renewed hostilities easier for Russia, Trump would mandate the nation to cut the size of its troops from their present approximately 800,000 personnel to a maximum of 600,000. Importantly, Trump's initiative sets no equivalent restrictions on Russian forces.

Seemingly as a gesture to Russia's attempts to portray Ukraine's democratically elected leadership as Nazis, Trump's plan asserts: "All extremist doctrine and actions must be opposed and prohibited." Apparently to underscore this point, it demands that "The nation will hold political contests in three months" of a peace deal. At the same time, the proposal sets no requirement that the Russian leader endanger his authoritarian rule by holding votes in his own country.

Protection Assurances

To be sure, the plan includes the Russian Federation commit not to "enter other states" and to "establish in legislation its position of peaceful relations towards European nations and the Ukrainian people". Yet taking into account that Putin has violated comparable agreements in the previous instances – such as the Budapest accord, in which the Russian government committed to recognize the nation's territorial integrity in exchange for giving up its historical nuclear arsenal, and the previous peace deals, in which Moscow promised to a ceasefire and a restoration of occupied territory in the region to the government – for what reason should the international community believe Putin now?

For this reason the Ukrainian government has been so insistent on international protection assurances. While the proposal threatens a "decisive unified defense action" in case Russia resume its military campaign, and states that "The nation will receive reliable defense commitments", the specifics include fuzzy to concerning. The initiative would not only block Ukraine accession to NATO but also prevent Nato members from stationing forces on the nation's land, thereby preventing the peacekeeping contingent, likely commanded by European powers, on which Ukraine had been counting to prevent Putin from replenishing his diminished military, re-equipping, and reinvading.

Global Response

Another side agreement reportedly would grant Ukraine with a alliance-like security guarantee, in which any later "significant, intentional, and ongoing armed attack" by the Russian Federation on the country "would be considered as an assault jeopardizing the peace and security of the transatlantic community." This indicates a armed reaction. But in contrast to a strong national defense – Ukraine's primary deterrent against additional invasion – the success of the side agreement would depend on the willingness of alliance members, like Trump, to respond through arms to Putin's attacks, a response they have {not