🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a controversial law change that forced local governments to put the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish other types of wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.