🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor always bore the pressure of her family legacy. Being the child of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the best-known English musicians of the 1900s, her name was enveloped in the lingering obscurity of the past.

An Inaugural Recording

Earlier this year, I contemplated these legacies as I got ready to make the world premiere recording of the composer’s piano concerto from 1936. With its emotional harmonies, soulful lyricism, and confident beats, Avril’s work will grant music lovers valuable perspective into how she – a wartime composer originating from the early 1900s – conceived of her existence as a woman of colour.

Shadows and Truth

However about legacies. It requires time to adjust, to recognize outlines as they really are, to distinguish truth from distortion, and I had been afraid to confront the composer’s background for some time.

I had so wanted Avril to be a reflection of her father. In some ways, she was. The idyllic English tones of her father’s impact can be observed in many of her works, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only review the headings of her father’s compositions to see how he identified as both a flag bearer of British Romantic style and also a representative of the Black diaspora.

It was here that father and daughter appeared to part ways.

White America evaluated Samuel by the brilliance of his art rather than the his ethnicity.

Parental Heritage

As a student at the prestigious music college, Samuel – the child of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – turned toward his African roots. Once the African American poet the renowned Dunbar arrived in England in the late 19th century, the 21-year-old composer was keen to meet him. He set the poet’s African Romances into music and the next year incorporated his poetry for a musical work, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral work that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an international hit, notably for African Americans who felt shared pride as white America evaluated the composer by the excellence of his art rather than the his race.

Activism and Politics

Success did not reduce Samuel’s politics. During that period, he was present at the First Pan African Conference in the UK where he made the acquaintance of the prominent scholar WEB Du Bois and observed a series of speeches, such as the oppression of African people in South Africa. He was a campaigner throughout his life. He maintained ties with trailblazers for equality including the scholar and this leader, gave addresses on equality for all, and even engaged in dialogue on matters of race with the American leader on a trip to the White House in 1904. In terms of his art, reminisced Du Bois, “he established his reputation so prominently as a composer that it will endure.” He died in 1912, at 37 years old. But what would the composer have thought of his offspring’s move to work in South Africa in the 1950s?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Child of Celebrated Artist gives OK to South African policy,” ran a headline in the Black American publication Jet magazine. The system “seems to me the correct approach”, Avril told Jet. When pushed to clarify, she backtracked: she was not in favor with apartheid “in principle” and it “should be allowed to work itself out, directed by benevolent residents of diverse ethnicities”. Had Avril been more in tune to her family’s principles, or born in segregated America, she might have thought twice about this system. However, existence had shielded her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I hold a UK passport,” she said, “and the government agents failed to question me about my ethnicity.” Thus, with her “fair” appearance (as Jet put it), she moved alongside white society, buoyed up by their praise for her late father. She gave a talk about her father’s music at the educational institution and led the broadcasting ensemble in that location, programming the inspiring part of her concerto, named: “In memory of my Father.” Even though a confident pianist on her own, she did not perform as the soloist in her work. Instead, she consistently conducted as the maestro; and so the orchestra of the era played under her baton.

She desired, according to her, she “might bring a shift”. But by 1954, circumstances deteriorated. When government agents discovered her mixed background, she could no longer stay the land. Her British passport offered no defense, the diplomatic official advised her to leave or risk imprisonment. She returned to England, feeling great shame as the extent of her naivety was realized. “This experience was a hard one,” she expressed. Adding to her disgrace was the release in 1955 of her ill-fated Jet interview, a year after her forced leaving from the country.

A Recurring Theme

As I sat with these shadows, I perceived a known narrative. The account of identifying as British until it’s challenged – that brings to mind African-descended soldiers who defended the English in the global conflict and made it through but were refused rightful benefits. And the Windrush generation,