🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."